Published: Thursday January 21, 2010 MYT 7:10:00 AM

NEW DELHI (AP): A syndicate of terror groups affiliated with al-Qaida might try to start a new war between rivals India and Pakistan as part of an organized effort to sow upheaval across South Asia, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday.

“I believe this operation, under the umbrella of al-Qaida working with all of these different groups, is intended to destabilize not just Afghanistan, or not just Pakistan, but potentially the whole region,” Gates said.

Gates described the relations between Taliban groups and Lashkar-e-Taiba extremists accused of orchestrating the 2008 terror attack on the Indian city of Mumbai, and he suggested the Pakistan-based militants might try a new terror assault on India to provoke a reprisal.

U.S. officials say one of their greatest fears is that Islamic militants who oppose the popularly elected governments in both India and Pakistan will find a way to get the nuclear-armed rivals fighting one another instead of the militants.

Gates praised his Indian hosts for restraint following the three-day terror siege of Mumbai, which India immediately blamed on militants inside Pakistan. There were no reprisals, and Pakistan has charged seven men. Yet it might not be the same next time, Gates said.

“The ability of any state to continue that, were it to be attacked again, I think is in question,” Gates said. “I have to leave the answer to that question to the Indian government and its officials, but I think it’s not unreasonable to assume that Indian patience would be limited were there to be further attacks.”

The United States has been trying to lower tensions between India and Pakistan to free up both nation’s military and economic resources. India, with its emerging economy, could be an important regional power in the U.S. view, while Pakistan could be a stronger bulwark against Muslim extremism.

“I think it’s a very complicated situation. I think it’s very dangerous for the region as a whole. I also think it’s dangerous to single out any one of these groups and say if we could beat that group that will solve the problem, because they are, in effect, a syndicate of terrorist operators intending to destabilize this entire region,” Gates said. “It does require a high level of cooperation among us all.”

Cooperation is likely to be a tough sell. The neighbors have fought three wars and remain wary over each other’s intentions. Pakistan is unhappy with India’s significant influence in Afghanistan, and India accuses Pakistan of harboring terror groups plotting attacks here.

Following the November 2008 assault on Mumbai, India froze talks with Pakistan that had been aimed at resolving the long-running dispute over Kashmir, which both countries claim in its entirety.

India is an important offstage player in the Afghanistan war, and part of Gates’ mission was to shore up support for the war effort without provoking further animosity between India and Pakistan. The United States sees Pakistan as a more central player in the Afghanistan fight, since militants who attack U.S. forces find shelter across the fluid border with Pakistan.

India, however, resents additional U.S. aid to its arch rival for what the United States says is cooperation against a shared threat from extremism and terrorism.

India has pledged more than $1 billion for Afghanistan rebuilding.

The militant groups Gates named Wednesday are all based along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. They include the Taliban branches in each country, and Lashkar-e-Taiba.

When one group succeeds in carrying out an attack, all of them gain in capability and reputation, he said. “A victory for one is a victory for all.”

*You can click here to read more.

Notes:

Another attempt to de-stabilize the region. Whether we will see another man-made-crisis or not, my concern is who will be the victim of the crisis and who will pay the price of the new crisis. While we hope and pray everyday for change, i believe this is not the change we are waiting for. I hope the report won’t materialize nor be accepted by anyone. Tired of listening to the same old propaganda whereby the invisible hands is trying at its best to control the mind of the people through unseen strings.

what was best for yesterday might not be the best for today or tomorrow. we all know that. but now everyone is using the past to claim their significance in order to wear the “modeller of the future” crown. i understand and i believe that in order to mature the population we need to provide them with examples i.e. right and wrong actions, practices. The reason being is this will assist them in making a better judgement and not a perfect judgement. We all should not take the past as ‘the only’ argument for tomorrow’s debate. I agree that what was done wrong in the past should be rectified and should be learned as a lesson. maturity is represented by the depth of the thought and not by the loud of the ctiticism.

i hope what we are witnessing now is a process of changing our respective politicians into a good and responsible statesman. And we too, should become a good and responsible statespeople.

at this juncture, i wonder what we see is what we saw,
before, everything runs smoothly but now, i ’see’ things crawling haphazardly,
once, i ’saw’ images clearly but nowadays, blurry as thick fog…

whether we are not listening enough,
or whether the noise is over-amplified by the unknown,
yet the voices are out of pitch and the dissonance overtook the rhythm…

the horizon changes as the contour arises,
yet the perspective reamains unchanged,
because we are not moving and not even moving…

1. Phlegmatic

2. Melancholy

i did a personality profile test and i got this as

my result. seems like what i’m doing know is totally

different from my personality. hmmm…

communication is the reaction that we received…

its going to be historical. its going to be memorable. yet the future remained unknown for the most of us who are being dictated by our consciousness, drive by our emotional and lead by our ignorance. while the understanding of conscience always lead to conflicts, conflicts can always be avoided  if and if only if, in depth we know what constitute conscience and not just a mere definition of it.

i’m eager to see what tomorrow brings yet i’m afraid if what i experienced yesterday was the best. today is about to end and at the soonest, we are going to see a new man standing on a big plateau on top of a hill, taking his vow promising for a better tomorrow yet will it be his. my best wishes goes to him and his family. hope the new dawn that we are about to see would not blinded us from accepting what is reality and what a utopia can be.

so be it mr. obama. again, my best wishes goes to you and your family. may the new dawn leads us to a harmonious land called earth.

regards,

fat max

Next Page »